Evidence-Based Practices on Blood Transfusion Reaction Procedures

The essay below examines one of the most critical challenges in clinical care—managing blood transfusion reactions—and shows that effective response requires more than routine steps. It blends practical nursing protocols with evidence-based insights, offering a clear picture of how patient safety can be strengthened through accurate monitoring, rapid interventions, and proper documentation. Rather than treating transfusion reactions as isolated events, this example highlights how evidence-based practice (EBP) integrates research, clinical judgment, and patient needs to create lasting improvements in care. Students can use this sample as inspiration when developing their own nursing assignments or exploring how EBP shapes clinical decision-making. And if you need extra support, our professional paper writers are here to help craft custom essays tailored to your academic goals.

Want an essay that makes an impact? Our skilled writers deliver plagiarism-free, top-notch papers every time.

Order now!

Importance of Evidence-Based Practice

EBP is significant for nurses as it offers a variety of benefits that aim to improve patient outcomes. This form of practice integrates scientific research, professional expertise, and patient-unique circumstances to build care delivery strategies. Within a clinical practice context, these elements allow nurses to make informed decisions in care delivery. EBP positively impacts nursing because it seeks to identify solutions that enhance patient outcomes. It will enable nurses to embrace new procedures. Usually, it may be challenging to change care standards that are already in place, especially in a hospital setting. Embracing EBP prevents nurses from falling into old patterns and adopting new, proven, effective procedures.

Moreover, implementing evidence-based practices upholds the relevance of new interventions and care protocols. These new interventions are developed from advanced existing techniques or discoveries that ensure positive patient outcomes (AdventHealth University, 2022). For instance, EBP may result in changes in standard current policies by revising existing guidelines to change or advance original recommendations to enhance patient care.

Similarly, integrating EBP into nursing practices enhances a nurse's career development. These practices encourage nurses to research more on new skills. Subsequently, they develop their interest areas, knowledge, critical thinking, and decision-making skills. These skills sharpen their expertise; a nurse could become a reference person in case of any inquiries (AdventHealth University, 2022). Lastly, EBP is an empowering tool to help nurses determine the appropriate care model. It involves a combination of nurses' expertise and current research, which empowers them by aiding established effective care practices, thus improving their job satisfaction. Furthermore, it contributes to the growth of science in nursing.

Hospital Policy

In a transfusion reaction, the nurse should immediately stop the transfusion, initiate an intervention while notifying the physician, cross-check the product and documentation, and monitor the patient's vitals. Kaiser protocols suggest adequate measures are taken to ensure the patient's safety. For instance, it recommends initiating proper emergency interventions based on clinical presentation. Anaphylaxis can quickly lead to cardiopulmonary arrest [5.3.2] (Kaiser Foundation Hospitals -San Jose. n.d.). This recommendation aligns with Suddock and Crookston's (2023) sentiments regarding intervention during transfusion reactions. The authors explain that anaphylactic is an acute reaction that causes severe reactions in patients with IgA deficiency. Thus, immediate interventions should be put in place to avoid fatalities.

The Kaiser policy also recommends Immediate and simultaneous notifying the physician responsible for the patient and the blood bank of a suspected transfusion reaction [5.3.3] (Kaiser Foundation Hospitals -San Jose. n.d.). This suggestion aligns with the Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne (2023), which urges that the reaction be reported to the physician in charge of the patient and the blood bank as quickly as possible.

Similarly, the Kaiser protocol suggests immediately rechecking/verifying that the information on the crossmatch report matches correctly [5.3.5]. Tobian et al. (2023) acknowledge the need to check if the product administered was correct. Checking involves confirming if the transfused blood was correct and if the patient and product labeling were accurate; the patient was identified correctly, then checking the product for any color changes or bubbles that would suggest contamination from bacteria. Ensuring that the units provided are intended for the recipient is also essential. According to the authors, the preparation steps involve establishing compatibility tests between recipient antibodies and donor red blood cells. Therefore, it is one of the vital steps before conducting a blood transfusion.

Lastly, the Kaiser protocol recommended monitoring and documenting the patient's critical signs in a 15 minute- span during a transfusion reaction in section [5.3.14] (Kaiser Foundation Hospitals -San Jose. n.d.). Suddock and Crookston (2023) state that transfusion reactions may range from mild to life-threatening symptoms. The authors acknowledge that one vital aspect of managing a transfusion reaction is to monitor the patient's vital signs while recording them at fifteen-minute intervals. Monitoring the patient's vitals is essential because some reactions can lead to complications and death in cases with severe effects.

Tonino et al. (2019) also say that frequent assessment of vital signs is for various clinical circumstances, such as blood transfusion. They acknowledge that receiving any transfusion could result in reactions that could manifest in abnormal vital signs before leading to an adverse event. Roney et al. (2022) recognize that vital signs usually have standard value ranges. However, there could be deviations from this range in some instances, which could be expected or signify a problem. The interpretation of the values depends on the contextual situation.

Research Studies Review

However, the Kaiser policy does not reflect the best EBPs in the following section. The policy states that any licensed personnel noting possible signs or symptoms of a suspected reaction should stop the transfusion [1.3] (Kaiser Foundation Hospitals -San Jose. n.d.). Technically, the patient should be managed by their assigned nurse. At the same time, management of reaction symptoms should be immediate after discontinuation. Some licensed practitioners do not have adequate knowledge of managing such reactions. Suddock and Crookston (2023) explain that normal transfusion reactions may resolve quickly, such as itching, fever, and chills. The authors also state that reactions can present overlapping symptoms that are non-specific. Thus, allowing any licensed individual to handle the patient may lead to errors and adverse patient outcomes since some may not be trained to differentiate various reactions. Blood transfusion should be conducted and managed by well-trained staff knowledgeable about effective emergency intervention strategies. For this reason, the Kaiser policy protocol should specify the type of personnel attending to the patient in this recommendation to avoid confusion.

Consequences

According to the policy, a transfusion reaction is an adverse patient outcome for a blood product transfusion. Chills, fever, skin rash, hypotension, or cardiac arrest characterize reactions (Suddock and Crookston, 2023). In some cases, there may be delayed reactions; thus, nurses should notify physicians immediately if any of the symptoms occur. Therefore, stopping the transfusion, informing the relevant physicians, rechecking, and verifying documentation leads to practical benefits due to the effective management of transfusion reactions.

Additionally, assessing vital signs is a critical aspect, especially in the event of a transfusion reaction. Part of the scheduled monitoring of patients after a blood transfusion reaction includes checking a patient's “temperature, heart rate, respiration rate, oxygen saturation, and systolic blood pressure” (Roney et al. 2022, p. 488). Monitoring these vital signs is essential to avoid poor patient outcomes; It helps to detect any anomalies (Tobian et al., 2023). Any changes in the critical symptoms help identify any possible issues.

According to various studies, reactions can sometimes go unrecognized due to inconsistencies in vital signs monitoring. One study indicated that many nurses estimate some of the patient's vital signs, such as the respiration rate, which leaves the possibility of undetected any other reactions (Tonino et al., 2019). The findings demonstrate the need for monitoring the vitals of patients. There have been policies such as monitoring patients' signs at intervals to improve such occurrences. The Kaiser policy caught my interest since I was curious to see what Kaiser policy protocols stated about such reactions if they occurred. In addition, its recommendations are relevant to patient care.

Blood transmission is a critical aspect of clinical practice and, if done carelessly, could lead to adverse patient outcomes. Therefore, I selected the above policy sections since I understand the significance of administering the correct blood product and documentation and monitoring a patient's vitals during blood transfusion and in case of a reaction. I once experienced a patient going through an anaphylactic allergic reaction characterized by hypotension, bronchospasm, vomiting, and loss of consciousness. The transfusion was stopped as the reactions could have been fatal. The problems arose due to improper blood products and documentation. During the reaction, the patient's vitals were constantly monitored, which helped stabilize the patient.

Summary

Management of transfusion reaction depends on the severity of the reaction. Nonetheless, the standard practices involve stopping blood transfusion, informing physicians and the blood bank, monitoring the patient's vital signs during a reaction, and reassessing the patient's documentation to help determine the problems and improve positive patient outcomes. The purpose of this policy is to ensure that there is proper management of transfusion reactions to avoid any adverse effects. The current EBPs show that the approach is still functional, and adhering to it will lead to appropriate control of reactions and positive patient outcomes due to minimal risks of severe effects.

My Role in Evidence-Based Practice as a Future New RN

As a new registered nurse (RN), I am determined to enhance my clinical competency through being updated with new research and being flexible to ensure improved patient care and clinical outcomes. This approach will allow me to implement evidence-based practices to provide quality care and positive patient outcomes. For this reason, I hope to stay informed. Receiving updates from the latest research articles and journals will help me be at par with updated solutions in my nursing field (AdventHealth University, 2022). I develop critical skills that will guide me in assessing the quality and validity of the research and the significance of the findings to my nursing practice. These skills will also help me evaluate and implement practices that perfectly suit the patient's situation.

In addition, I am committed to incorporating the most effective evidence-based guidelines into my daily practice. Care practices should be patient-centered and tailored to the specific patient's needs while making decisions. Accordingly, I will employ collaborative strategies with other healthcare professionals to ensure that the EBPs are implemented. Moreover, my role would also involve educating and sharing knowledge with other colleagues to foster a culture of using EBPs. For this reason, I will prioritize open and effective communication within the work environment.

In case there is an opportunity to participate in research, I would take part in it. My participation would help generate new evidence that is likely to improve care. EBP involves continuous learning and collaboration to improve patient care and outcomes and advance nursing practice. I hope to foster an environment differentiated by innovative strategies and knowledge to improve patient care and outcomes.

Overall, evidence-based practice (EBP) focuses on the core of the nursing concept: patient care. EBP positively impacts nursing by providing quality, holistic care based on the most recent knowledge and research, thus identifying solutions that enhance patient outcomes. Blood transmission is a critical aspect of clinical practice. In a transfusion reaction, the nurse should immediately stop the transfusion, initiate an intervention while notifying the physician, cross-check the product and documentation, and monitor the patient's vitals.