Back to all samples

Bipolar Disorder Treatment Strategies and Client Experience

APA, Doctorate
5 pages, 5 sources

Discover how to craft a powerful paper that blends clinical insight with personal storytelling. The research paper example on bipolar disorder below is more than a collection of facts — it’s a journey through the challenges, treatments, and lived experiences of managing this complex condition. Whether you’re looking to explore the scientific aspects or capture the human side of bipolar disorder, this sample will inspire and guide you.

Feeling stuck? Our professional writers are here to help you create a unique and compelling essay that stands out.

Bipolar disorder (BDP) is a complex mood disorder that affects nearly 2.4% of the world population and has dire implications for both clients and society (Goes, 2023). Exploring the clinical presentation, treatment and management, and real-life experience of a client diagnosed with BPD type I supported by current research findings and insights gained from a clinical interview. Attributes, such as background, pathophysiology, treatment, and social determinants of the condition, are interrelated with the firsthand experience of a bipolar individual.

Condition Background

The epidemiology and presentation of bipolar disorder underline its significant public health impact and complexity. The estimated lifetime prevalence of BDP across the adult population is 1.3%, with substantial direct health services costs and indirect costs due to unemployment and disability (Maassen et al., 2018). The interviewed individual spoke of this impact, as he had had several episodes that interrupted career progress and relationships with others in the last decade.

Recent findings on both the diagnostic classification and course patterns of bipolar disorder show evidence of clinical subtypes with varying prognoses. The condition manifests in two main subtypes, bipolar I and bipolar II, including bipolar I with at least one manic episode and bipolar II with hypomanic episodes and depression (Tondo et al., 2022). The disease commonly starts in the late teens or early adulthood, and over 75% of the patients present clinical features by the age of 25 years (McIntyre et al., 2022). While the prognosis of BDP is unpredictable, the key aspects influencing the disease outcome include early and appropriate treatment and social support (Bonnín et al., 2019).

Pathophysiology

The neurobiological mechanisms of bipolar disorder comprise multiple intricate networks and structures in the brain. In BDP, patients’ changes have been documented in different sentimental and cognitive regions, such as the prefrontal area and limbic system (Goes, 2023). These results are in concordance with the interviewed individuals, who reported problems with emotional control and decision-making in both manic and depressive states.

Both molecular and systemic mechanisms of bipolar disorder portray an intricate integration of neurological systems. Such mechanisms are dysregulation of neurotransmitter systems, mainly involving the dopamine and serotonin pathways (McIntyre et al., 2022). Moreover, disruption in circadian and stress response systems has been reported to contribute to mood instability and trigger episodes (Bonnín et al., 2019). Many of these neurobiological changes present in observable symptoms that lead to functional impairments that affect daily life and social functioning.

Condition Management

Bipolar disorder is best treated by a multimodal approach, which includes both pharmaceutical therapy and psychological interventions. Effective treatment involves mood stabilizers, structured psychotherapy, and regular client symptoms and functioning monitoring (Goes, 2023). In the interviewee’s case, this integrated model proved effective in achieving more excellent stability through consistent medication management and regular therapy sessions focused on identifying early warning signs and developing essential coping techniques.

Skilled professionals in the mental health treatment process for BDP include psychiatrists who manage medication, psychologists who provide psychotherapy, and social workers who address psychosocial needs. This model often greatly enhances outcomes via essential psychiatric monitoring, psychological support, and social intervention (McIntyre et al., 2022). Evidence also supports the benefits of combining family education and support groups to increase compliance with treatment and decrease relapse rates.

Functional impairment and quality of life are critically important areas that occupational therapy should address during the rehabilitation of clients with BPD. Occupational therapy studies show that these clients benefit from functional remedial programs and cognitive rehabilitation to enhance their daily motivations and interactions with others (Bonnín et al., 2019). The interviewed individual greatly profited from the occupational therapy interventions, including strategies to establish daily activities, meet workplace demands, and develop skills to minimize stress in occupational roles.

Pharmacological Intervention

The pharmacological management of bipolar disorder focuses on mood stabilizers, with lithium still considered the most effective treatment for the long term (McIntyre et al., 2022). The results of the current systematic investigation indicated that lithium showed higher superiority in protecting against manic episodes; however, the role of lithium may be less pronounced regarding bipolar depression. This implication of BPD was supported by the interviewed individual, who received lithium treatment for manic symptoms but needed more strategies to control depressive episodes.

The pharmacological approach involves the appropriate choice of drug combinations and timing. Current treatment plans call for tailoring the dosing schedules according to the primary symptom type, history of episodes, and other subjects that affect a particular patient (Goes, 2023). This pharmacological approach has been supported by improved results in both managing acute episodes and maintaining long-term medication treatment for BPD.

Second-generation antipsychotics and anticonvulsants have become essential pharmacologic therapies, especially during the acute stage and maintenance phases. Such medications, however, have unwanted side effects, like weight gain and altered metabolic rates, and may even cause the patient to lose cognitive function (Goes, 2023). These side effects present a significant problem in treatment compliance, as observed by the interviewed person, who changed doses several times to find the right combination of symptom management and acceptable side effects. Regular monitoring of medication blood levels, metabolic parameters, and kidney function is essential to prevent potential complications and ensure patient safety during long-term pharmacological management of BPD.

Social Determinants of Health

Socio-demographic factors show a strong relation to the development of bipolar disorder, how the disease progresses, and its treatment. Studies have shown that people with lower socioeconomic status encounter a much greater level of strain when they seek specialized mental health services and try to maintain continuity (Maassen et al., 2018). The interviewed individual explained how employment stability and health insurance directly influenced consistent treatment and improved results.

Other factors, such as cultural and environmental influences, compound the effect of bipolar disorder across populations. Research has identified differences in detection, treatment availability, and probabilities of illness in a particular population compared to others (Tondo et al., 2022). Such disparities are very apparent in the regions where mental health is not well developed or where specific care and early intervention may be complex to provide. Further, social support sources and stigma reduction in employment and community domains were identified as necessary for BPD recovery and long-term functioning. According to Tondo et al. (2022), better employment and social support structures were directly related to better treatment compliance and enhanced functional recovery.

Impact on Individual

The interviewed person depicted the complex clinical picture and functional consequences of bipolar disorder. They had received their first psychotic diagnosis after an acute manic episode in their late twenties when their symptoms resulted in substantial interference with social and occupational adjustment. Their depressive episodes expressed themselves in severe fatigue, the tendency towards inattention, and withdrawal from social interactions. These symptoms are occasionally exacerbated with periods of mania manifested as sleep disturbances, decreased work efficiency, antagonized problem-solving, and behavioral restraint.

The interviewed person has recognized significant changes in occupational engagement, especially in work and interpersonal interactions. According to Bonnín et al. (2019), these difficulties are parallel to some of the functional impairments common in bipolar disorder patients. For instance, the individual listed work attendance issues during episodes of depression and interpersonal relationship issues during manic sprees. Still, they managed to practice strategies for maintaining the job and reinstating the social part in client’s lives during structured occupational therapy employing routine building and stress management.

Their management approach entailed the use of drugs, psychotherapy, and lifestyle changes. Based on recent literature, this holistic treatment approach enables better stability in daily functioning and optimal quality of life (Maassen et al., 2018). The individual especially noted how the ability to identify signals and apply preventive measures has helped to sustain occupational roles and relationships.

Conclusion

Discussing bipolar disorder from a research perspective and examines the narrative of an interviewed person. Exposed the impaired functioning in bipolar disorder and the necessity of engagement in a multimodal approach, which considers the severity of clinical symptoms as well as functional outcomes. Managing the disorder depends on the interaction of biological mechanisms, treatment strategies, and social factors (Tondo et al., 2022). The findings of this study underscore the importance of a personalized approach and integrated care to enable clients with bipolar disorder to achieve better functioning and quality of life.

References

  1. Bonnín, C. D. M., Reinares, M., Martínez-Arán, A., Jiménez, E., Sánchez-Moreno, J., Solé, B., Montejo, L., & Vieta, E. (2019). Improving functioning, quality of life, and well-being in patients with bipolar disorder. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 22(8), 467-477. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyz018
  2. Goes, F. S. (2023). Diagnosis and management of bipolar disorders. BMJ, 381. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-073591
  3. Maassen, E. F., Regeer, B. J., Regeer, E. J., Bunders, J. F., & Kupka, R. W. (2018). The challenges of living with bipolar disorder: A qualitative study of the implications for health care and research. International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, 6(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-018-0131-y
  4. McIntyre, R. S., Alda, M., Baldessarini, R. J., Bauer, M., Berk, M., Correll, C. U., Fagiolini, A., Fountoulakis, K., Frye, M. A., Grunze, H., Kessing, L. V., Miklowitz, D. J., Parker, G., Post, R. M., Swann, A. C., Suppes, T., Vieta, E., Young, A., & Maj, M. (2022). The clinical characterization of the adult patient with bipolar disorder is aimed at personalization of management. World Psychiatry, 21(3), 364–387. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20997
  5. Tondo, L., Miola, A., Pinna, M., Contu, M., & Baldessarini, R. J. (2022). Differences between bipolar disorder types 1 and 2 support the DSM two-syndrome concept. International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-022-00268-2
Call us (Toll Free)